A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2013, the Defendant asked the above E to the effect that “I would like to have a witness to the effect that I would like to go beyond the mixed ones when I opened the door of the Galet store operated by F, I would like to have the above E give a false testimony as I would have observed even though I had not observed it at the time of the injury, and around 15:00 on September 15, 2013, the Defendant would like to have the Cheongcheon-do branch operated by the Defendant in Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Macheon-gun, Madong-gun, Madong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongdong-gun, Cheongcheon-do, Cheongdong-do, Cheongdong-do, Cheongdong-do, Madong-do, 2013.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Copies of the second protocol of trial; and

1. Copies of the examination records of witnesses (E);

1. A copy of the written oath;

1. A copy of the police statement concerning F;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. A copy of an injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of judgment);

1. Articles 152 (1) and 31 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the occupation of a perjury and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant's act of aiding and abetting perjury more actively in the denial of his criminal act is a crime that obstructs the proper exercise of the judgment authority, which is the judicial action of the State, and the discovery of substantial truth, and thus, the nature of the crime is inferior, the defendant instigated the defendant to give false testimony despite his absence of the scene of the defendant's injury, and the prosecutor's office's suspicion of perjury is often used to deny the suspicion of perjury even in the course of investigating the suspicion of perjury. However, the defendant led to the confession of the crime, and the criminal conviction of the same kind of crime.