The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is unfair in light of the following circumstances: (a) the defendant's mistake was recognized by the defendant; (b) the defendant had no previous conviction in the same kind; (c) the defendant appears to have not obtained economic benefits from the crime of this case; and (d) the defendant has a child of intellectual disability that the defendant should look at; (c) perjury requires a proper exercise of judgment authority, which is a judicial action of the State, and strict punishment for a crime that obstructs the discovery of substantial truth; (d) the defendant was sentenced to one year for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in 2012, and the execution of the sentence was completed; and (e) the defendant was tried to commit a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry after having been sentenced to imprisonment with labor for one year, and the execution of the sentence was completed; and (e) the crime is not good for the defendant to be tried to violate the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry; and (e) the court below appears to have determined the punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant; and (e) other reasons for sentencing of this case, the defendant's circumstances after the crime of this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.