A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) filed a dispute with customers at a singing room in C, which was located in C on December 7, 2017, and was taking part in the singing room’s corridor; (b) received notification from Defendant E on the procedure for handling the instant case; and (c) received notification from Defendant E on December 7, 2017, to the said E.

From now on, it interferes with the execution of official duties.

"...................................................

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., the confession and reflect of the defendant, and the absence of any criminal record exceeding the same kind of criminal record or fine);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;