A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 00:45 on May 30, 2017, the Defendant: (b) on the front of the Silung-si, a police officer E belonging to the Silung Police Station D District Team, who was sent to the site after receiving a 112 report on the said fighting, engaged in a assault or assault.

“The name of thener, where any, has been changed;

The author tried to put his hand in the outer kn't kn't kn't and kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't, the above E continuously dn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't k'

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 report processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the F and G respective Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (see, e.g., the fact that the defendant led to the confession of and seriously reflects on the crime, the fact that the damage of the defendant affects the crime, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;