logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.19 2017구단80151
손실보상금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff A KRW 5,770,550, KRW 930,600 to the Plaintiff B, and KRW 8,437,300 to the Plaintiff E and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public announcement - Business name: F district housing redevelopment rearrangement project - Project implementer: Defendant - Business approval: G public announcement of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on August 16, 2013;

B. The Plaintiff A subject to expropriation made on December 23, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Plaintiff A-owned land”) - The Plaintiff B: the Songpa-gu Seoul District Land Tribunal of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”) and the entirety of obstacles, such as the above ground buildings, etc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”): the Plaintiff B: the Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City IW 22 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”) and all obstacles, such as the above above ground buildings, etc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff-owned land”): The Plaintiff C: the Seoul Songpa-gu JJ 47.7 square meters and the detailed statement of compensation for each of the instant written judgment on expropriation of the Plaintiff C and D are indicated as “Seoul Songpa-gu J 47.7 square meters.7 square meters.”

On the other hand, the appraisal report of L, which conducted the court appraisal, states that the land lot number is the expected substitute lot number.

(The previous lot number is not indicated). The congested consortium, the plaintiff C, and D are deemed to have shared the specific land owned prior to replotting in the same proportion of shares. However, there is no evidence to verify the lot number of the previous land. Thus, the plaintiff C and D's each land subject to expropriation is to be indicated as it is in the written adjudication on expropriation and the detailed statement of compensation in the respective written adjudication on expropriation.

(hereinafter “Plaintiff-Owned Land”) and the building above the building above the building above the building above the building above the building of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government was owned by Plaintiff C and D with each share of 1/2 before being expropriated. However, the details of the building in the register of the register are “46.235 square meters, 46.235 square meters, 26.235 square meters, 3 stories, 46.235 square meters, 46.235 square meters, 46.235 square meters, 46.235 square meters, 46.235 square meters, - Land, 1, 2 stories, 3 stories, and 46.25 square meters, and 46.235 square meters, and 46.235 square meters, and - The building above the building above the building was owned by the Plaintiff C and D:

arrow