logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.10.16 2019구합170
수용재결처분취소
Text

Of the instant lawsuits, the part of the claim filed by the Central Land Expropriation Committee against Defendant is dismissed.

2. Defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1): D (hereinafter “instant project”)

2) Public announcement of project approval: E 3 project operator announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on October 5, 201: Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation.

B. The date of the adjudication of expropriation by the Central Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): The date of adjudication of expropriation by the Defendant Central Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”): (i) the object of expropriation, such as the entry in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 through 65 in [Attachment 1], (ii) the same as the entry in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 through 65, 65, and (iii) the single floor of the 1st floor of the 2nd floor of the Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, the 1st floor of the 2nd floor of the 2

(2) The contents of the adjudication on compensation for losses and other obstacles (designated B ownership; hereinafter referred to as the “selected B ownership obstacles”) 1: (2) as indicated in the attached table Nos. 1 Nos. 66 through 91; and (3) as indicated in the attached table No. 66 through 91; (4.92 square meters, 134.92 square meters, 134.92 square meters, 134.92 square meters, 134.92 square meters, and 3) owned by the Plaintiff; (3) the contents of the adjudication on compensation for losses and the designated parties C: 278,753,840 won: 141,57, 120 won; 3) the designated parties’ application for compensation for relocation expenses for the housing of the designated parties C; (4) the designated parties’ application for compensation for relocation expenses cannot be considered as having resided in the Plaintiff’s housing and housing owned by the Plaintiff at the beginning of 2011.214

As a result of the appraisal by this Court (hereinafter “court appraisal”): 14,866,640 won (based on recognition), each entry in Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 1 and 2 (including each number of branches), the result of the appraiser H's appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in attached Form 2;

3. Whether the part of the claim against the defendant is lawful or not.

arrow