A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

around 20:00 on June 9, 2016, the Defendant passed through a restaurant of “R” located in Qu in Busan Northern-gu, Busan.

30-year women's rear habits were able to report their 30-year women's sex, see their her her her her her her her friend, her her her friend, and followed them.

이에 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관에게 현행범인 체포되어 같은 날 20:30 경 부산 북구 S에 있는 T 지구대에 인치되자, 피고인은 근무 중인 순경 U에게 “ 야 이 짭새야 조용히, 해 라, 쭉이 삔다” 는 등 심한 욕설을 하고, U는 때리려고 하여 그 지구대 소속 순경 V이 수갑을 채워 소파에 앉혔다.

피고인은 수갑을 차고 소파에 앉은 채로 경찰관들에게 계속 욕설을 하며 바닥에 가래침을 뱉는 등 소란을 피우고, 화장지로 바닥에 묻은 가래 침을 닦으려는 위 순경 V에게 “ 야 이 씨 발 놈 아, 니 뭐꼬 ”라고 욕을 하며 오른발로 오른쪽 허벅지를 2회 찼다.

As such, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to W and V;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph by cutting down a course;

1. The relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, the grounds for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommended punishment] [the grounds for sentencing of sentence]] that there is no person [the person who has been sentenced to special sentencing] in the basic area (from June to January 1 and April) [the person who has been sentenced to punishment] [the person who has been punished for violent crimes] three times even if the defendant had been punished for obstructing the execution of official duties among them, and the defendant committed a crime of obstructing the execution of official duties on March 22, 2016 while the period during which the defendant was suspended from the period of probation due to the crime of injury, etc., and again committed the crime in this case. However, the defendant is relatively minor and the degree of damage is relatively minor, and the above V goes against the above V and thus, the above V written confirmation that "the defendant's mistake is divided" (an agreement is reached.