1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is the person who was the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives of the Namyang-si, the defendant was the representative of the above apartment.

B. Preparation of a qualification-based document and its event (1) on November 19, 2015, the Defendant decided at the council of occupants’ representatives of the above apartment on November 19, 2015, to request the dismissal of the Plaintiff at the council of occupants’ representatives of the occupants’ representatives, and the title “receiving of the minutes of the council of occupants’ representatives” which was previously created, and “Omission” (1).

2. The Ddong E, appointed as the chairperson of the temporary occupant representative on the day, shall take time so that it does not interfere with his/her duties when vicariously performing temporary duties;

3. In particular, the main time is to ensure that there is no particular case of causing confusion in the work from the dismissed plaintiffs, and in addition, the withdrawal of the official seal managed by the plaintiff and the presentation of the official seal, and in the case of non-compliance, personal action will not cause confusion;

4. To report the dismissal and the personal information of temporary agents in the Southyang-ju housing, which is a competent administrative office, to ensure that the progress of business is not hindered (hereinafter omitted), and “Temporary Representative Meeting of Residents and Ddong E” were sent to E, and E signed “E” next to them.

(2) However, according to the above apartment management rules, the above apartment is selected for each Dong and composed of 12 representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives' representatives. If the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives falls under reasons for dismissal, he/she shall request the dismissal procedure to the election commission with the consent of a majority of all members of the council of occupants' representatives or at least 1/10 of all all all occupants, etc., and make a decision of dismissal with the consent of a majority of voters. Therefore, even if the council of occupants' representatives decided to dismiss the plaintiff on November 16, 2015 with the consent of seven members of the council of occupants' representatives, including the defendant,