logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2014.12.19 2014고단836
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, who became aware of the fact in social gathering C, has operated a variety of business with the virtue that “the name in which a considerable person is a person who is a person who is a person who is a person with a personal history,” provided funds to the Defendant, and the Defendant himself/herself has also carried out the two types of business with at least nine billion won.

1. On April 2012, the Defendant, in the name of the victim’s job referral service for the Korean bank employment broker, stated that “The victim, in a public restaurant located in D E in the early 2012 Police Station, “The victim, who is well aware of the national president’s identification of the identification of the identification of the identification of the national president, may allow the victim to find employment with the Korean Bank for the volume of 1 to 1 to 1,00 per year, but only 5 to 60 million won per week, will have the young children employed at the Korean Bank.”

However, the defendant, as the head of the National Bank, was not aware of the person who could have a influence on the personnel affairs of the National Bank, and was willing to use the money as the previous debt repayment and living expenses.

Nevertheless, on April 30, 2012, the Defendant, who was unaware of such fact, received KRW 3 million from the victim by means of false statement, and thereafter, received KRW 60 million from the victim to the first bank account in the name of F as designated by the Defendant around April 30, 2012, and received KRW 60 million from around that time to December 27, 2012 under the name of the victim’s employment intermediation fund for the national bank by all seven times as shown in attached Table 1 No. 1. 1.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired 60 million won as a job placement fee for the victim's children.

2. The Defendant, under the pretext of the fee for arranging a loan of KRW 2 billion, stated that “The Defendant would arrange to obtain a loan of KRW 2 billion on the face of KRW 20 billion from the Plaintiff at H located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Geumsan-gun, the victim operated by the victim, “The Plaintiff is the property with a view to gathering KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, the facts are two billion won to the complainant.

arrow