logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.03.26 2014고단3256
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2010, the Defendant, at the office of licensed real estate agents operated by the victim E in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, displayed a sales contract of F apartment house worth KRW 2.25 billion with the above victim as if he had re-satisfed. The Defendant stated that “B, upon investing money with a stock expert, has a loss incurred until now since the stocks and futures have been granted, and the principal shall be guaranteed, and the principal shall be returned at any time.” On July 2010, 201, the Defendant stated to the effect that “B, upon investing money with a stock expert, has a loss incurred by the stocks and futures, and the principal shall be returned at any time.” On November 201, 2010, the Defendant stated to the same effect as the Defendant’s statement of remittance to G who is the victim and the litigation documents to receive the return, and said false statement to the effect that the Defendant displayed the victim’s winning receipts of KRW 2.4 billion with the same KRW 2.4 billion with the first 25th m

However, the facts revealed that the Defendant was not a stock expert, such as the fund manager, and the Roto 25th class 1, etc. of the Roto 26 May 2003 received KRW 18.9 billion of the Roto Roto 18.9 billion from May 26, 2003, but most of the above apartment purchase price was consumed until December 2008 due to hospital investments, stock investment failure, etc., and the above apartment purchase price of KRW 2.25 billion was consumed due to repayment of the existing debt amount of KRW 2.5 billion and stock investment. The Defendant returned KRW 500 million from G and written a written waiver of the remaining amount. A civil lawsuit filed by the Defendant against G was withdrawn on October 12, 2009 by the Defendant, and the Defendant did not have the ability to return the principal to the victim under the pretext that the Defendant did not have any loss of credit amount of KRW 12.2 billion from the existing investor and did not have any loss of credit amount of KRW 5 million.

The Defendant deceivings the victim as above.

arrow