Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall threaten, threaten, or cause any danger to traffic by continuing or repeatedly committing any act, of violating signal or instruction as prescribed by the Road Traffic Act, violation of speed limits, crossing, driver of any motor vehicle, etc., violation of prohibition against crossing, driving a motor vehicle, etc., maintenance of a safe distance, violation of prohibition against changing course, violation of prohibition against rapid driving, violation of prohibition against interference with the front or the front motor vehicle, occurrence of noise without justifiable grounds, violation of method of driving ahead of an expressway, violation of prohibition against crossing, Uton, or follow-up on an expressway, etc.

Nevertheless, from around 10:34 on April 2, 2017 to 10:43 on the same day, the Defendant violated the restriction speed by driving a Category B Neas-si car at approximately 110km to 268km to 28km to 281km to 281km to drive a B Neas-si car at approximately 138-160km to h, and the Defendant violated the restriction speed by driving the B Neas-si car at approximately 138-160km to h. As above, the Defendant violated the restriction speed, and operated the overtaking method on the expressway, such as changing two lanes from one lane to three lanes from one lane to one lane from the end of the bridge cell line where it is prohibited to change the course again, in violation of the restriction speed as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal reports, internal investigation reports, photographs of violated vehicles, etc. (related to attachment of images regulating breadth);

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 151-2 and 46-3 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not less than the standard of driving in the instant case, the sentencing case and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and criminal records in a similar case.