A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Around 02:20 on August 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) boarded a taxi in front of the “C pharmacy” located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) took a bath that he would be recommended from the victim D, who is a taxi engineer, to use another taxi; (c) spits down spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit spit 30 minutes of a card terminal that is installed between the chief and the driver’s seat, and thereby preventing the victim from operating a taxi normally, thereby hindering the victim’s operation of the taxi and damaging property owned by the victim.

2. On August 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed an assault, such as: (b) taking the police officer’s desire to refrain from the police officer’s desire from the police officer F of the police box affiliated with the above police box; and (c) taking the desire to “the sprinke sprinks died, sprink sprinks, and sprink sprinks,” and taking the bath to “the sprinks, sprinks, sprinks, and sprinks, sprinks, sprinks, and sprinks in Seoul Jongno-gu.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (Interference with business);

In this regard, Article 366 of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 366)

In this regard, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (which interferes with the execution of official duties)

O. Imprisonment selection)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution [the scope of the recommended sentence] 1) Business Interference [the basic area: June 1 to June 2] Interference with the performance of official duties. The basic area [the type 1] interference with the performance of official duties: 6 months-1 year-4 April 3] Damage and destruction [the type 1].