logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.09.12 2017고단811
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Defendant was acquitted of fraud on March 3, 2016.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant worked together with the victim C and LG U E Center in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Inc. F, a customer center in Geumcheon-gu, and had been in the relationship between the police officer of December 2, 2015 to May 31, 2016.

1. Fraud;

A. On February 2016, the Defendant, at the end of the foregoing Defendant’s office, does not need to be independently independent after having requested the victim to inquire about the house to be separated from the Defendant.

The defective victim made a false statement to the effect that “In order to cancel a contract by already entering into a provisional contract, it is necessary to compensate for damages, and even if so, it would be possible to compensate for the additional money.”

However, there was no real estate provisional contract and there was no intention or ability to pay profits to the victim because the defendant thought that he would use the money received from the victim as an Internet gambling, etc.

The Defendant was transferred from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant, KRW 7.4 million around March 2, 2016, KRW 1 million around March 8, 2016, KRW 6 million around March 9, 2016, KRW 500,000 around March 10, 2016, KRW 4.5 million around March 12, 2016, KRW 500,000 around April 1, 2016, KRW 5 million around April 1, 2016, KRW 3.9 million including KRW 5 million around April 2, 2016, and KRW 5 million around April 2, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On May 22, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim at the same place as the above A, stating that “The Defendant will report the inquiry about the limit of loans on the face of a card” to the victim at the same place as above.

However, the facts were that the defendant received a credit card loan from the victim's name and used it for personal purposes.

The Defendant acquired a credit card loan of KRW 3 million on May 22, 2016 and did not change the credit card loan of KRW 3 million from the victim's name. The Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 3 million.

(c)

The defendant around June 1, 2016, at the same place as the above A, "work Dong G." to the victim at the same place as the above A.

arrow