1. Of the entire facts charged in the instant case, the crime of 2016 order 1479 [Attachment 1479], the crime of 2016 order 186 [Attachment 1886], and the crime of 2.33 [Attachment 2016 order 233].

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten-month imprisonment due to the charge of forging official documents in the Busan District Court's Dong Branch, and the sentence was finalized on May 7, 2015 and is still under a suspended sentence.

In 2004, the defendant, "The 2016 Highest 1095, the defendant, while working as the secretary at the office of a certified judicial scrivener office in around 2004, is to communicate with the victim F with each other and to know it.

1. From the end of 2011, the Defendant would allow the victim to use the credit card as telephone to pay necessary expenses to a certified judicial scrivener in the course of performing his/her duties, and pay 10% of the settlement amount as fees to the victim so that the victim can only be viewed as benefit without any loss to the party in the name of the credit card.

1. As seen, the Plaintiff made a false statement to the effect that the Plaintiff was “.”

However, the Defendant did not have any other property owned at the time, and since a certified judicial scrivener who gave birth to a child on March 201, who gave birth to a child and gave franchise, had to pay KRW 1 million, which is the former husband, for living expenses, etc., since he/she had to pay for the amount of KRW 1 million, which is the former husband, due to the fact that he/she had to pay for the amount of KRW 1,00,000,000,000, which is the former husband, there was no intention or ability to pay the amount normally when he

Nevertheless, on March 8, 2012, the Defendant had access to the Internet site of the card company, which used the Internet, and applied for a loan of KRW 12 million in the name of the victim by using a new card received from the victim, and received payment from the above company on the same day.

2. On March 2012, the Defendant would pay KRW 5 million to the victim in addition to the amount of KRW 5 million after three months from the lending of money to the victim by telephone.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, it is true that the defendant borrowed money from the injured party due to the economic situation such as the preceding paragraph.