The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for one year and six months, for Defendant B, and for Defendant C.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Prosecutor 1) misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles (Defendant D and E) O Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “O”)

(1) At the time of delivering KRW 100 million to A, B, and C, as the most important thing was to promptly complete the heating work and receive the remainder of the work price. As such, Defendant D, E, and C were given KRW 100 million upon making an illegal solicitation that they may receive any balance from the core executives of the council of occupants' representatives, such as A, B, and C. Therefore, the receipt of KRW 10 million through C and A ought to be deemed as the implied solicitation that may interfere with the work at the council of occupants' representatives and completed the work without intention in relation to the apartment heating work, and that delivery KRW 100 million to B, etc. at the time of that delivery is merely the fact that the delivery of KRW 100 million to B, etc. was made by dividing the remainder of the work price by imprisonment with prison labor for at least 10 years, which is the core part of the council of occupants' representatives, and that it would be meaningful for the court below to have known that Defendant C and C were unlawful after the fact that it was unlawful.