beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. From the end of September 2016, the Defendant stated that “A” restaurant in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, that “D” (hereinafter “D”) victim E (the husband created and operated a company that is F in Korea, while having received KRW 100 billion from LG and selling money to LG, he/she would have to recover money that would result in the Plaintiff’s death. In order to recover money, the Defendant first must transfer money to two Korea as tax, but if he/she borrowed money, he/she would bring money after this molding the money.” If she would make up money, she would invest KRW 30 billion in expanding the hospital and establishing the museum.”
However, in fact, the husband of the defendant did not operate the above F, or did not operate the business in the two parts, and there was no 100 billion won which may be inflicted on the two parts, and there was no property under the name of the defendant and no income exists, and even if he received money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the money.
On October 25, 2016, the Defendant received KRW 30 million from the damaged party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (G) under the name of the Defendant, as a loan for investment around October 25, 2016.
2. On November 22, 2016, the Defendant stated that “In order to enter the money, the Defendant should first check whether the head of the Tong was used by remitting the amount of KRW 10 million to a person who is in the planning and re-scepting area to the victim’s phone at a time unscepted place,” and “in order to enter the money, the Defendant should first check whether the head of the Tong was used.”
However, in fact, H did not work in the planning and finance division with the children of the defendant, and there was no 100 billion won which was brought from the two parts of the above 1.1. The defendant did not have any property or income under the name of the defendant, and there was no intention or ability to pay the money even if he received the money from the victim because H thought that he did not use the money with the money received from the victim as living expenses.
The defendant belongs to this.