logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.07.05 2016고단106
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud against the victim D is acquitted. It is so decided.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around December 2008, the Defendant was living together with D from F in Gangnam-gu Seoul E building to the land by the land manager, and the victim G and H are between D and the land manager.

1. The criminal defendant against the victim G is in need of money to the victim G at the J coffee shop located in South-gu, South-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul in February 2009.

the loan shall only be used and returned if it is lent.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have a contract for a construction project at two times, and was at the disadvantage of credit at the time, and there was no particular property, so even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and transferred KRW 38 million to the K account in the name of the victim on April 27, 2009.

2. 피해자 H에 대한 사기 피고인은 2009. 4. 7. 경 세종 시 조치원읍에 있는 상호 불상의 쌈 밥집 식당에서 조치원에 살고 있는 피해자 H에게 전화하여 " 두바이에 수조 원 건설공사를 땄다.

all of the road works shall begin with the road works.

The money enters the Fund, and after one-way month, it is not clear whether it can be fully repaid with at least the amount of the heat. Mad, Sejong-si, a few hundred million fakes.

The Corporation is not a corporation.

2.0 billion won bankbooks have been seized, but only he/she may pay off the 2.0 billion won bankbooks.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, there was no fact that the contract was entered into between the two parts, but there was no head of a Tong which was seized in the 2 billion won foot, and there was no other her bad credit position at the time, and there was no other property, so even if there was no intention to repay the money from the injured party, there was no intention to do so.

Defendant deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 80 million in total, including KRW 30 million on the same day from the victim, and KRW 50 million on May 4, 2009, to the account in the name of K.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court;

arrow