1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. A evidence Nos. 2 is added to the 3rd [Evidence] of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "date of the pronouncement of this judgment" of the 11th parallel 17th parallel 5 is as "date of the pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance", and the 3th parallel 13th parallel 13 to 4th parallel 2 are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case of the 3rd parallel 13th parallel 17th parallel 17th parallel 1

【A vehicle driver shall stop at the right edge of the roadway when stopping on the road, according to Article 34 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 11(1)1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Road Traffic Act, even if the vehicle stops on the road. However, according to the entries or images stated in the evidence No. 7-8, 19, and No. 2 of the Road Traffic Act, C may find the fact that the vehicle stops on the three-lane at the right edge of the bus while stopping on the road before the bus stops on the other side of the two-lane and stopping on the road at the right edge of the roadway. Thus, C is negligent in stopping on the road, while stopping on the road at the right edge of the roadway, and stopping on the road (the Defendant stops on the right edge of the three-lane, but at the right edge of the bus, the vehicle stops on the right edge of the road, and even if the bus stops at the right edge of the road without any possible change in the speed of the bus, it appears that it is inevitable for C to stop on the right edge of the vehicle.