logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.04.17 2014고정564
협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014, 564"

1. Around 00:50 on March 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim D (21) who was living in the next house of Gwangju Northern-gu, Seoul, with the fact that the victim D (21 years of age) was found, and said D (21 years of age) was fright, and that the victim was frighten, and that the victim was 505 years of age, and the victim was frightened at the head of the 505 entrance, and the victim was able to take care of the victim outside the entrance of the above 505 entrance, such as “the victim was frightened of frighte, chewing fright, dead and discarded.”

"2015, 45"

2. On June 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a property damage in a public telephone room managed by the victim F, installed in front of the E apartment at a wooden city, by e-mail; (b) on a multiple occasions without any special reason, he destroyed two copies of the market price of the telephone fire and drinking gas, which are worth KRW 100,000,000, in favor of the public telephone boxes.

Summary of Evidence

"2014, 564"

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the third protocol of the trial, and the defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement D in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. The protocol of statement by the police about D 2015,00;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of G by the prosecution (including the statement of H, I, and J);

1. Each police statement made to the F and J;

1. A written statement of I and G;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (2015, 43);

1. On June 28, 2014, the summary of this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant, within a soup smoking room located in Manpo-si K on June 28, 2014, she took care of the Defendant, who she was the fryr of the victim her tobacco, to I and J, and the victim did not answer the victim.

arrow