logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.06.16 2015가단221518
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff A's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff B's claim is dismissed.

3. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. G owned No. 1,511 (hereinafter “H land before division”) and No. 175 (hereinafter “I land before division”) on October 23, 1965, G transferred the deceased’s property jointly by the head and the family heir N (O, the president of the deceased, died on March 14, 1951, and N inherited the deceased’s property jointly.

B. On December 31, 1965, H land before subdivision was divided into P or Q (hereinafter “divided land”) on December 31, 1965, and R 1,408 was divided into R, S or T in 1977, and R was divided into R in 1987, and R was divided into U in 1987 (attached Form No. 4); S was divided into V in 1982 (attached Form No. 2); and W was converted into X (attached Form No. 1) in 1984.

C. Before subdivision, I’s land was divided into Y and Z in 1965, Y was divided into Y and AA in 197, Y was divided into Y and AA in 1983, Y was divided into AB in 1983, and AB was merged into AC in 198.

(The land listed in Annex AC 3). (d)

Meanwhile, on December 31, 1965, the registration of transfer of ownership was completed on the land before subdivision 1,408 and I before subdivision from the deceased on December 31, 1965 on the ground of sale and purchase on December 27, 1965. Defendant C completed the registration of transfer of ownership on September 9, 197 with respect to R after subdivision on September 13, 197, and Defendant D, E, and F, the wife and children of Defendant C, the joint heir, died on June 8, 201, completed the registration of transfer due to a consultation and division on each land listed in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the separate sheet on November 15, 201.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 7, Eul evidence 2 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff A’s judgment on the legitimacy of the Plaintiff’s lawsuit is based on the instant lawsuit, which was sold after the death of the Deceased.

arrow