A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On April 24, 2013, at around 13:40, the Defendant: (a) entered the Eda operated by the victim D (the age of 63) located in the area B of the Jeonbuk-gun; (b) without any justifiable reason, brought a multi-faced floor to the Eda operated by the victim D (the age of 63) without any reason; (c) and (d) took a bath to four customers in the area of the multi-faced area; and (d) interfere with the multi-faced operations of the said D by force by force by putting four customers in bad name, who were in the multi-faced area, into the area of the said multi-faced area.

B. On May 22, 2013, from around 09:00 to 09:20, the Defendant: (a) stated, without any reason, the Defendant entered the Edab operated by the said D, that “I will see the said D as follows: “I will see, she will do so; (b) she will have the glusium; (c) she will have the glusium; (d) she will have the flusium; (c) she will have the flusium, and (d) will have the flusium, and (e) would interfere with the instant D’s multiple business by force, such as: (a) she would have the customer F, etc. who was seated in the flusium

C. On May 2, 2013, the Defendant, while drunk from around 12:20 to 12:30, expressed again in the instant D’s multiface while drunk, without any reason, the Defendant expressed that “Isia, Isia, hysia, hysia, hysia, hysia, hysia,” and obstructed D’s multi-facel business by force by locating six people out of the country, such as the bar of the guest.

2. On April 26, 2013, the Defendant suffered property damage: (a) around 13:15, 2013; (b) was under the influence of alcohol from Hususki G in the Jeonbuk-gun, the Defendant continued to open and shut down the doors of the said I; and (c) caused the said I to have the cement block installed on the floor to cover KRW 130,000, the entrance of the said I owned by the said I for repair costs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and Article 314 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;