A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the right-hand side side part of E on the ground that E, a police officer belonging to the police station of the Speaker called the Defendant, recommended the Defendant to pay the drinking value on the spot, by having received a report of 112 that customers would not pay the drinking value at a singing room operated by Da, which is operated by Da at the time of the Government-si, on April 10, 2017; and (b) assaulted the part of E’s double part and the bridge on the two to three occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to 112 report processing.

2. In the case of insult C at the time and place described in paragraph 1, the Defendant shall do so to the victim E, who is the police officer belonging to the police station of the Council of the Republic of Korea, who is a police officer belonging to the police station of the Council. The Defendant shall do so. The Defendant shall die inside.

Magal Magio

Aler who has died once today, whether a width is a stick among the public or not.

Along with the expression “Crehion ......”, the victim was openly insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. Photographs, CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (to listen to police officer E phone calls);

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act reflects in depth the Defendant’s mistake; (b) the Defendant committed any contingent crime by drinking alcohol; and (c) the Defendant has no previous conviction.