The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel

A. Although the Defendant misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles, he was driving a dysculous vehicle, there was no threat of D by driving a vehicle over three times for four minutes as stated in the facts charged, and there was no intention to threaten the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the court below erred by misunderstanding the facts charged or by misunderstanding the legal principles of special intimidation, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, based on the statements of D without credibility.

B. In light of the fact that an accident has not occurred due to the operation of automobiles by the illegal defendant's vehicle, and that the defendant supports his mother and is in an economically difficult situation, the sentence of the court below that sentenced a fine of KRW 3 million is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s determination as to the assertion of misunderstanding the facts or misapprehension of the legal doctrine is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court, namely, ① the victim D threatens a vehicle that the Defendant drives on August 22, 2016 and continues to drive in danger by threatening the vehicle it drives, around 07:40.

112 신고를 하였고, 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 “ 고속도로 주행 중에 피고인의 승용차가 옆 차선에 바짝 붙어 같은 속도로 주행하면서 내가 운전하는 승용차를 밀어붙일 것처럼 위협하고, 깜빡이도 켜지 않고 갑자기 내가 운행 중이 던 1 차로 앞쪽으로 끼어들고 급 감속하고, 내가 2 차로로 차선을 바꾸자 진로 변경 위협을 주면서 다시 급차로 변경을 하면서 앞으로 끼어들어 운전하는 등 위험한 운전 방법으로 계속 위협하여 공포심을 느꼈고 실제로도 사고가 날 뻔했다.

In the event of the death, 112 reports should be made in that situation.

The victim is consistently stated as “,” and the victim’s cambling images of the victim’s car.