logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.05 2017고단307
특수협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 22, 2016, at around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) driven a Do 5 lane in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the road along the Do 5 lane; and (b) driven by the Do Do 5 lane in the Hannam-gu along the three-lanes to the Hannam-do Gyeong-do ebbbbb, the Defendant considered the victim, on the ground that the F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f c

After changing the two lanes, the defendant continued to overtake the three-lanes of the above franchises, and thereafter, the above franchises are in the future, changing the lane into the two-lanes, and the above franchises are moving into the two-lanes, and as the franchises are changed to the one-lanes, the vehicle will be changed to the two-lanes, and as the franchises are changed to the two-lanes, the vehicle has interfered with the course by the victim in the future.

As a result, the Defendant carried a dangerous object, and expressed the attitude of harming the victim's body, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting down a black stuff image;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (average circumstances favorable to the grounds for sentencing);

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are disadvantageous to the reasons for sentencing at the Nowon-gu Station, raise the possibility of traffic accidents by threatening the victim to a vehicle with a high traffic volume on the road. - No particular effort was made to reach an agreement with the victim. The favorable circumstances - the Defendant recognized all the criminal facts. - The Defendant has no penal history except for a fine sentenced around 1986. - The degree of the Defendant’s intimidation, duration of continuation, etc. should be taken into account.

arrow