Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On January 2, 2017, the Defendant did not borrow 15 million won from the Defendant while the Victim C puts clothes in the body of the Defendant, and there was no fact that he sawd by women, etc. or sold in the body of the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the defendant is not guilty of the "C" to D and E.

The head of the Gu, which was put into use by the other party, was the gue that was put into use by the other party, and the 15 million won was loaned at the time of the Guideology, but the money was not repaid for six months, and was seized.

C This is a non-performance.

Women are forced to return due to a softener and women are forced to return.

Women, etc. and friende is gue.

C is the first generation of a school, but bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a school.

C 100,000 won of its inventory goods were sold to it.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each legal statement statute in witness D and C;

1. Relevant Article 307 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged was that the Defendant provided a guarantee to D and E before 20 years prior to the date, time, place, and place stated in the facts charged.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. According to the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, D, during the telephone conversations with the victim on January 3, 2017, the Defendant said D’s “Blshesheshesheshes in money with a letter of guarantee.”

It is recognized that the statement was made to the victim.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, namely, D, stated to the effect that it would know about the contents of the guarantee in this Court, and ② D.