A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 2, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court for the following reasons: (a) on May 27, 2010, sentenced four months to imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; and (b) on September 30, 201 during the execution of the sentence, the suspended sentence was invalidated on September 17, 201; and (c) on November 17, 201, the remaining term of imprisonment was expired.

【Criminal Facts】

1. "2013 Highest 233";

A. A. On January 24, 2013, the Defendant driven C Poter Cargo Vehicles while under the influence of alcohol with a 0.145% alcohol concentration on the front of the Southern-gu Busan Metropolitan City Authority, which is located in the Southern-si Authority on January 24, 2013.

Accordingly, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

B. Around 02:45 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment”), while driving C-M5 vehicle with blood alcohol concentration of 0.145% under the influence of business, and driving one lane in front of the Southern-gu Intersection in front of the Southern-gu Intersection in the Gu and Sinsido, the Defendant was under the influence of 0.145%, and driving one lane of the three lanes in front of the Nam-gu Intersection in front of the Nam-gu, U.S.A., the Defendant neglected the duty of Jeonju in the front direction while driving the e-M5 vehicle in the front direction of the said cargo due to occupational negligence, and was under the influence of the victim D (24 years old) traveling in the front direction of the said vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time, the Defendant did not stop and escape without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim, even though the Defendant destroyed the above SM5 vehicle backer, etc. owned by the victim to cover KRW 2,556,146.

2...