A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 29, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. in the Goyang Branch of the District Court of the Republic of Korea on September 29, 201, and on March 30, 2012, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 4 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On May 10, 2014, at around 03:25, the Defendant driven Bi30 automobiles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 3.5km alcohol concentration of about 0.198% at the section of approximately 3.5 km from the front road of the Hanpo-si, Sin-si to the front road of the headquarters of the Corporation located in the same city.

Accordingly, the Defendant again driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act as a person who violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice.

2. The Defendant is a person driving a vehicle B i30 vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.)

On May 10, 2014, at around 03:25, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol of 0.198% of blood alcohol level, and led to two-lane the EC three-lane distance in the Gu and Sinsi-si, the Gu and Sinsi-si, the Gu and Sinsi-si, along the two-lane distance from the Gu and Sinsi-si.

At the same time, as a red signal, the victim C(44 years old) driver's Doz car was stopped for the signal atmosphere, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by driving safely by examining the trends such as reducing speed and driving a motor vehicle on the front.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded with the victim's back of the passenger car due to negligence, and received the part of the victim's back part of the passenger car in front of the passenger car.

Ultimately, the Defendant is treating the victim C by occupational negligence above for about three weeks.