logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.12.18 2013고단1034
사기미수등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for four months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 28, 2009, Defendant A was faced with an accident falling at approximately about 15 meters at the G Training Institute located in the F in the Hasan-si, and was involved in the repair work, Defendant A had a false disability diagnosis document submitted to the victim life insurance company and the victim life insurance company with a false disability insurance, etc. to the effect that the accident insurance, etc. was subscribed, and acquired the insurance money by fraud.

Therefore, the Defendant issued a written diagnosis of disability with a view to using insurance proceeds for the purpose of claiming insurance proceeds. Although the facts are possible to lead a daily life, such as an independent walking after treatment, the Defendant was issued a written diagnosis of disability with a view to making it impossible for the Defendant to conduct an independent behavior and making it impossible for him/her to live together with an unfaithful response to the inspection, on July 21, 2010.

Around August 4, 2010, the Defendant filed a claim for insurance proceeds payment of KRW 371,00,000 on the ground of the following disability diagnosis certificate with respect to the life insurance company for the victim, which was issued to the life insurance company for the victim, and filed a claim for insurance proceeds payment of KRW 371,00,000 on the ground of the victim's disability diagnosis certificate. However, it was confirmed that there was a need to re-evaluation of the victim's disability I's disability diagnosis during the review related to the payment of insurance proceeds. Since the Defendant was aware that there was no disability in daily life, the Defendant was aware that there was no disability in the daily life of the victim, and the Defendant did not receive the claim for insurance proceeds from the victim and did not make the claim for insurance proceeds.

In addition, from that time until August 29, 2012, the Defendant filed a claim for the payment of insurance proceeds on the ground of false disability ratings with the life insurance company for victims and the life insurance company for victims, as shown in the attached list of crimes, at least eight times in total, but did not lead to the occurrence of false disability ratings with the victims.

arrow