logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.01.27 2014고단3436
상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 22, 2013, the Defendant is a person who was sentenced to imprisonment for four months with prison labor for an injury at the Daejeon District Court on April 2, 2013, and whose judgment became final and conclusive on November 30, 2013, and is currently under probation.

1. On May 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:50 on May 21, 201, 2014; (b) in front of the Victim C’s house located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, on the ground that the Victim C did not receive the phone, and (c) in front of the Victim C’s house, the Defendant opened a gate with a wooden door by walking the lock door, and went into the door.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and infringed on the victim's residence.

2. In the same time and place as the above paragraph 1, the injured Defendant reported the victim D(52 years of age) together with the above C, and took the side glass of the victim who could take care of several times, and stroked the victim's stroke by hand, and strokeed the victim's stroke in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement concerning C and D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. An investigation report (in relation to the entrance doors damaged);

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Articles 257 (1), 366, and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. In light of the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders, it is reasonable to sentence the sentence stated in the text of the Criminal Act in light of the fact that the crime is committed during the same period of probation, the recovery of damage has not been achieved, and the fact that there are many same kinds of

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.

arrow