1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who runs a mobile phone sales business in the name of “E” from May 2013 to February 2014. Defendant B, while running a mobile phone sales business, intended to open a new opening on the condition that he/she purchases a mobile phone terminal from F along with F to a person who wants to borrow a small amount of money. At the same time, he/she disposes of the mobile phone at another place, disposes of the mobile phone at the same time, and lends funds to the opening name in return (hereinafter referred to as “personal phone loan”).

Defendant

A was introduced by Defendant B and F through Defendant B and F due to the difficulty in the operation of “E” and carried out “personal phone loan”, the Defendants and F agreed to open the cell phone with a view to gaining a more easy profit from the opening of the mobile phone and using a forged identification card.

Accordingly, if Defendant B and F provide Defendant A with personal information of other persons and a forged identification card copy, Defendant A used it to purchase a mobile phone in the name of the other person, and newly joined the SK Telecom, and immediately deliver the opened mobile phone terminal to Defendant B and F, and Defendant B and F intended to make profits by disposing of the terminal, and conspired to commit the following crimes.

1. On October 11, 2013, Defendant A, using a copy of the forged G resident registration certificate of Defendant B and F, entered name “G”, resident registration number H”, and address “Seoul-do Bupyeong-si” in the customer information column of new service contract which was kept at the same time, Defendant A forged private document as the above “E” store operated by the Defendant on October 11, 2013, entered the name “G”, “H”, and “I” in the customer information column of the new service contract, and entered the shipment price of 954,800 on the LT34 rate of LT34 per month in purchasing S 4 at the Ggallon-si LT ju, and signed on the last part of the contract.

Defendant continued to do so.