The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not intentionally inflict a bodily injury on the victim B by fluoric fluor.

B. The sentence of a fine of KRW 700,000 imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the following circumstances, which are duly adopted and examined by the court below in full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined, and ① the images of CCTV for crime prevention: (a) the victim has been sniffed with the Defendant’s timber and arms; (b) the victim has reached once knife with the Defendant’s upper part of the Defendant’s upper part of the body; and (c) the image of the upper part of the body is consistent with the victim’s statement or its damaged photograph; (b) the victim is likely to have damaged the completeness of the body or interfered with physiological functions due to the reverse cover of the upper part of the body, and (c) at the time of the police investigation, the victim did not have any intention to inflict any injury on the Defendant’s upper part of the facts charged, such as the victim’s intentional injury, in light of the fact that the Defendant intentionally inflicted any injury on the Defendant’s upper part of the body, as stated in the facts charged.

B. As the Defendant appears to have committed the instant crime as he/she was assaulted by the victim during his/her trial with the victim, the degree of injury to the victim is minor, and after having been punished by a fine by an act of violence around May 194, the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime.