A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates a bread house.

피고인은 2016. 12. 1. 05:50 경 안산시 상록 구 C 앞길에서 바닥에 누워 있던 성명을 알 수 없는 여자의 몸 위에 올라 타 실 랑이를 하던 중, “ 여성이 폭행을 당하고 울고 있다” 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 안산 상록 경찰서 소속 경사 D로부터 “ 두 분이 서 왜 이렇게 되신 거에요 ” 라는 질문을 받자 그대로 현장을 이탈하려 하였고 이에 위 D가 “ 잠깐만요 ”라고 피고인을 붙잡자 화가 나, “ 아 우 씨 발 뭘 어쩌라 고, 씹새끼야 ”라고 욕하며 주먹으로 위 D의 오른쪽 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 양손으로 동인의 멱살을 잡아 흔들며, 발로 위 경찰관의 양쪽 정강이를 수회 걷어차는 등 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄 예방 및 치안 유지 등 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Relevant photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (hereinafter referred to as "video analysis");

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The act of obstructing the execution of official duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act requires strict consideration as a violation of legal order and public authority.

However, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition.

There is no previous offense exceeding a fine.

In addition, the degree of assault, age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. of this case and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the previous theories shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors.