A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

around 20:00 on August 4, 2015, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, she set off a DNA te-te-te-te-te-te-te-te-te-p-te-p-p-te-p-te-p-p-p-p-p-s-p-k-k-k-h-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-k-

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the reasons for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment with prison labor, and the reasons therefor;

1. Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor in the mitigation area (one month to eight months) of Class 1 (Interference with the performance of public duties and coercion of duties) (in the event of a person subject to special mitigation), the mitigation area (in the event of a person subject to special mitigation), which is minor;

2. Determination of sentence: The sentence shall be determined in full view of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant’s age, occupation, sex, environment, and circumstances before and after the instant crime.

The defendant, upon receiving a report on another person's motor vehicle's hand, takes a bath to the police officers dispatched, and assaults one of the police officers, and the nature of the crime is bad.

Such interference with the performance of official duties needs to be strict as a violation of legal order and public authority, and if the act continues to be committed, it will be damaged by a good citizen.

The defendant has a record of the suspension of one-time execution and the punishment of three times of fines.

Therefore, the defendant seems to be well aware that his own act would be subject to criminal trials.

Nevertheless, the defendant leaves his domicile and is also subject to cell phone contact.