Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation that runs the construction business in Incheon Strengthening-gun, and is obligated to take safety measures to prevent the industrial accidents of workers employed at the construction site in this case as a person who constructs approximately KRW 1,100,000 "E (hereinafter referred to as "the construction site in this case") by being awarded a contract for approximately KRW 1,100,000 from the Reinforcement-gun, Kimpo-si, and Defendant B is the actual representative director of A, a corporation that manages the safety management of the construction site in this case, and is a person responsible for safety and health

In accordance with the guidelines for material disaster management for at least two workplaces where at least three months of medical care have occurred at the same time. On June 19, 2015, at around 08:40, when the worker F and G engaged in the work of dismantling the vision at the non-levels of about 3.6 meters high at the construction site of this case, the Defendants: (a) caused the collapse of the vision; and (b) caused the Defendants to suffer from the injury requiring medical care for at least 12 days in violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act as follows.

1. Defendant B did not perform the duty to take safety measures as follows at the construction site of this case on June 19, 2015.

Where any work is conducted in the vision after assembling, dismantling, or changing the vision, the Defendant did not check the state of forests of the connecting part of the relevant vision or of the connecting part before commencing the relevant work, even though the Defendant did not check the state of forests of the connecting part and the connecting part installed at the construction site of this case.

2. The Defendant Company A, a Defendant’s employee, did not take necessary safety measures as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning G;

1.Industrial accident compensation insurance of G and F.