A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2016, the Defendant, at around 23:55 on July 2, 2016, failed to pay the drinking value at the main point of “C” located in “C,” and, upon reporting the business owner’s business owner, called the Defendant F.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who was recommended by F to pay the drinking value and return home from F, expressed the desire to F, etc. to “Ye, Habbk walk walk, walk walk walk,” and “We walp walk, walk, walk, and walk walk,” and received F’s face by pushing the F on his own ship while he was notified by F of F without any justifiable reason, by refusing to pay the continuous payment.

Accordingly, the suspect interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. F’s statement of statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to G written statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The fact that a crime against a police officer who is performing official duties for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act should be punished strictly, that a serious result, such as a fatal injury, does not occur, and that the records of violent crimes, etc. are taken into account;