A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 22, 2016, at around 23:50, the Defendant: (a) laid a small-sized scambling in the Guro-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (b) brought an injury to the injured party D (V, 41 years old) with a dog that requires approximately five weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant, who interfered with the performance of official duties, spits spit once, at the bottom of the right edge of police officers F belonging to the E police station, called “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling the victim’s face under the influence of alcohol at the above date, time and place.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the 112 reporting processing.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to F, D, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (in relation to attachment of photographs), to report internal investigation (in relation to attachment of photographs), to handle reports of 112 reported cases, to report an investigation (in relation to a diagnosis of an injury and attachment of damaged photographs), and

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the fact that the police shows the attitude against the police while committing a crime, the fact that the police was drunk to commit an contingent crime, the fact that the police did not have any criminal record exceeding a fine;