A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2017, around 22:45, the Defendant avoided the disturbance in front of C 102, which is located in Gumi-si B, Seoul.

“Around 112,” from E in the circumstances where the Gu-U.S. police station D police station affiliated with the D police station, assaulted the horses, such as “Arrecing the sound, Ma.”, “Arrecing the chest of E on two occasions by a sudden drinking.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (limited to attachment of images which obstruct the suspect from performing his/her official duties);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. As to the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, the punishment as indicated in the disposition is determined by comprehensively taking account of all the circumstances such as the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act was sentenced to a fine for interference with the performance of official duties in 2008 and there were many other previous records of violence; (b) the degree of violence was not significant; (c) the defendant went to the human resources market to engage in daily labor; and (d) the defendant was aged and was unable to seek jobs; and (d) the defendant was committing an accident by drinking