A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 10, 2012, the Defendant purchased the Defendant’s “in the office of the victim D in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building,” “in the inside of the victim, KRW 4 billion is invested, and E invests KRW 16 billion, and purchased the F-Japan land in the Yongsan-si Seoul Metropolitan Government.

It is intended to sell a 299-household unit in that place, and to remove G golf practice centers in that place.

The contract for the removal of the golf range has been entered into with another business operator, and the contract has been reversed and the construction has been reduced to the party, and in return, the cost of KRW 100 million has been changed to the party.

For Russia, Fusz.

7. It is possible to remove from the horse.

‘False speech' was made.

However, H Co., Ltd., in which the Defendant had been working at the time, paid only KRW 500 million as down payment to the landowner of the above F F F F F land, and only planned to carry out the construction work of PF loan with E as the contractor. In order to carry out the said construction work, the amount of KRW 43 billion was required, and it was intended to raise the funds by means of giving PF loan under the guarantee of the contractor’s selection of the contractor, but it was difficult to carry out the construction work of FF loan because it was located in the location where it was difficult to raise the funds for the construction work. Therefore, it was practically impossible for the Defendant to give the victim a contract for the removal of the golf course.

The Defendant, on June 21, 2012, issued five copies of the original check at the victim’s next coffee shop in the victim’s office on June 21, 2012, and the same year.

7. 12. At the coffee shop in the first floor of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I building, a delivery was made in cash of KRW 50 million to the injured party’s partner.

2. On August 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim’s office, stating, “On the part of the victim’s office, the Defendant borrowed KRW 20,000,000 to the victim with the payment of the said money within one week.”

However, as set out in the above paragraph 1.