A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant C (hereinafter “C”) and Defendant C (hereinafter “C”) had no authority to authorize the removal of money in relation to the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D’s redevelopment project (hereinafter “this case redevelopment project”). Notwithstanding the absence of such authority, the Defendant and Defendant C (hereinafter “C”) were to acquire money by means of loan.

The Defendant was working in E, a real estate development company, around August 2015.

F In relation to this redevelopment project, C is the head of the partnership, and the head of the partnership is working as the current auditor of the national bank, so C is not able to reach all the things.

In the end, the building may be demolished, and the victim G was introduced from F, and on the 10th of the same month, the victim was first met, and the defendant was "the president of the cooperative is the current national bank auditor."

Now we could see that we believe us and conclude a contract and request 20 million won on the condition that we prepare a contract.

After August 26, 2015, the Defendant and C are in a coffee shop in the “I hotel” hotel located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and C is in a friendship relationship with the victim from F.

Since the president of the cooperative is an incumbent bank auditor, the president of the cooperative did not directly engage in his/her delegation. The defendant put the corresponding equipment to this end, and as the defendant stated "C" and "J" of the E representative director of the cooperative, "A" shall carry out the removal construction work necessary for the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Senior Housing Complex Construction Project, and "B" shall enter into a removal construction contract and obtain approval of the construction work at the same time so as not to impede the execution of the construction work as determined by the contractor, and the removal work shall be ordered to start within November 30, 2015, and the removal work shall be ordered to start and deliver "A removal construction contract" to the victim.

However, fact C does not have relationship with the president of the redevelopment project.