The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The facts below the basis of facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence 1 to 9 and Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including cases where there are serial numbers).

The Plaintiff is a person who promotes the creation of solar power plants on the south Sea-gun D and 14 lots, and Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is issuing and selling paper E newspapers and Internet F (G) as a regional newspaper company located in the Gyeong-gun, South-do, South-do. Defendant C is a reporter belonging to Defendant B.

On the other hand, Defendant C news articles that the Plaintiff is at issue are as listed below.

The article No. 1, June 14, 2016, as the article No. 1, August 16, 2016 (hereinafter “instant article No. 1”).

② The article No. 30, August 30, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “instant article No. 2”).

③ The article No. 13, Sept. 13, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “instant article No. 3”).

B. On June 14, 2016, Defendant E published an article stating that “H” as the title “H” in the Defendant E Newspaper, on June 14, 2016, the residents of the IJ, the K, the K, the K, the L, and the south Sea-gun raised suspicions on the background of providing convenience, such as granting the permission for the solar power generation project, which is an individual business, and installing the access roads, and cannot be seen as the environment and forest destruction caused by the power generation business. In addition, the article stating that “The residents need to transparently disclose the design and authorization matters related to the solar power generation project, etc. and to hold a briefing session and debate.”

C. On August 11, 2016, at the International Community Center of South-west, the public hearing was held in relation to the Plaintiff’s solar power generation projects. On August 16, 2016, the article 1 of this case as the title (O) of “N” [the size of 40phones, vitalitys’ centralization] and [the title] / [O] of “Attachment 1” was published.

On August 18, 2016, the Plaintiff is Defendant B.