1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On January 30, 2018, Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Co., Ltd.”) published an article to the effect that “the J organization filed a complaint against the K Chairperson and M&D to the prosecution on January 30, 2018 due to the suspicion of violation of the Act on the Prohibition of Acceptance of Improper Solicitation and Valuables, etc., and the Banking Act,” prepared by Plaintiff A on January 30, 2018.

B. L, upon posting the article on the A homepage, demanded to delete immediately.

Plaintiff

The head of the Social Department A deleted the article on the Plaintiff’s website after about 20 minutes from the time the article was posted with the consent of the I reporter.

C. Around May 2018, Defendant C, the reporter of Defendant C, was informed to the Plaintiff I who retired the Plaintiff and that “the Plaintiff deleted the article in return for payment from L.”

Accordingly, on May 28, 2018, Defendant C posted an article of May 28, 2018, prepared by Defendant D, as the title “N” on the F website (hereinafter “instant first article”).

The article was deleted by L’s civil petition. The article was deleted by the article “The director of the Social Department of Plaintiff A received three articles in lieu of her shot.”

The purpose is “. L. D. The purpose is to apply for adjustment against Defendant C (case No. 2018 Seoul 12831284). During the procedure of mediation, Defendant C agreed to modify part of the instant article with L and the instant article. On August 14, 2018, Defendant C revised the instant first engineer into a revised article (hereinafter “instant revised article”) and posted it on the website. The revised article deleted the expression “three”, and the director of the social department stated that “the director of the social department received monetary payment” instead of issuing an article.

" was changed to the purport of "".

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 3, 4, Eul evidence 3 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is "the first and revised articles of this case" A.