A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 22:30 on November 10, 2017; (b) 22:30, the Defendant: (c) dumped and flaped from the “G of the F operation of the Victim E located in Yasan-gu, Yancheon-si; (d) flaped with the table table with the table table, and flap with the table table, flap with the table table, and flap with the other customers; and (d) flap with the cump and blap with the victim. However, the Defendant continued to engage in the flap with the flap, flap, with the knowledge of who the fla

A tin-opener shall not be placed in any more than one time after the tin.

"A police officer who was sent to the police after having received a report from the victim" but refuses to leave the police officer, and "a person who sings only sing and sing alone."

씨 발" 이라고 소리를 지르고 손님들에게 " 어이 어르신 뭘 쳐다봐 "라고 시비를 거는 등 약 30분 동안 위력으로 피해자의 주점 영업을 방해하였다.

2. 재물 손괴 피고인은 제 1 항 일시, 장소에서, 출동한 경찰관들과 밖으로 나오다가 경찰관들에게 소리를 지르며 " 시시비비를 가리자. 내가 뭘 잘못했냐

In this weather, the gue marith Ma, and the 2-3 times of drinking signboards owned by the victim, and damaged the repair cost to the extent of 300,000 won by having the teared part of the carcry at the time of drinking.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the police report (on-site conditions and photograph attachment-related Acts and subordinate statutes) to the defendant's legal statement F

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes lies in a large number of identical criminal offenses against the defendant, and committed similar crimes, and the defendant is deemed to have committed a failure at the same place of business in the past, and the defendant seems to have committed a crime in the same place of business in the past, and on the other hand, he/she is agreed with the victim (the defendant is a person who habitually commits a disturbance of drinking, and is punished by the victim of this case.