The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 21, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc.) committed assault against the victim on the part of the victim E (the age of 39) in the vicinity of D located in Gwangju Seo-gu, about October 21, 2015, when he was boarding in the steering house of the victim E (the age of 39) and was driving in the vicinity of the H funeral hall located in Gwangju Seo-gu, Gwangju, without any reasons remaining after being drunkd.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the time and time set forth in the above paragraph (1) above, and near H funeral hall located in Seo-gu in Gwangju-gu, he saw the above taxi to take care of her when she stops the above taxi, and thereby, damaged the above taxi, which is owned by the victim limited partnership company I, to require the above taxi to take care of 881,404 won, including repair costs.

3. On October 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 21:35, the Obstruction of the Performance of Official Duties: (b) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender committing the crime described in the above paragraph (1) when the police officer belonging to the J District of the Gwangju Western Police Station, who received 112 reports on the said paragraph on the fire fighting distance located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (c) arrested him as a flagrant offender, and (d) arrested him as a flagrant offender committing the crime described in the above paragraph (1); (d) boarded the inside light light operating devices, etc. on board the patrol police officer, and (d) requested the above patrol officer, etc. to escape from the back seat while leaving the Defendant; and (d) took the front seat of the said K’s face one time a week, and made an assault on the right side of the above knb by drinking-gu, and (e) took the front side of the said knb to the port of the said knb.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of the above K, L, and M, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the Prosecutor of the Military Prosecutors' Office 1.