1. On April 11, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of medical care for official duties rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a public official of the Si on March 1, 2010 and served as a local administrative assistant in B Si administration from that time to that time.

B. On February 20, 2012, while performing official duties in B City Planning and Coordination Office (the name of the department) from around 201, the Plaintiff occurred, and on March 14, 2016, filed an application for approval of medical treatment for the instant injury and disease on official duties with the Defendant on March 14, 2016, asserting that “The instant injury and disease occurred between the Plaintiff’s official duties and the instant injury and disease” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”).

C. On April 11, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care for official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “this case’s injury and disease is deemed to have been caused due to a ejaculation or erroneous attitude, physical lack, etc. during the daily life, and there is no proximate causal relation between official duties” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

On July 7, 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee, but was dismissed on November 9, 2016.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 30, 31, Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Inasmuch as the Plaintiff asserted that he was a public official B, who was a public official B of the Republic of Korea, performed a statistical work, accounting, etc. to the extent that it was excessive, and the burden was accumulated on the part of the Presidential Decree, resulting in the occurrence of the instant injury and disease, there is a proximate causal relation between the Plaintiff’s public official

Therefore, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful.

(b) Entry in the attached statutes of the relevant statutes;

C. The “official disease”, which is the requirement for payment of expenses incurred in the performance of public duties under the Public Officials Pension Act, refers to a disease caused by official duties during the performance of official duties. As such, official duties and diseases.