logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.01.24 2018구단51563
공무상요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of medical care for official duties rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From January 1, 2015, the Plaintiff was a local public official (class) of Ansan-si, who was a local public official (class) in charge of the affairs of civil service at the community service center B.

B. On October 21, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) went to work at around 06:58; (b) and (c) went to work at around 18:16; (b) and (c) where the accident occurred in the certificate 2 (emergency certificate), the place where the accident occurred is indicated as “G”; (b) Party A’s certificate (sales slip) is indicated as “D”; and (c) the trade name stated in the above sales slip appears to be more accurate.

In addition to the workplace rent, there was an accident (hereinafter “instant accident”) that happens in the chair who was seated at about 20:40, and the head was faced with on the floor and was faced with the head (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. On October 23, 2015, the Plaintiff was transferred to E Hospital by the 119 first aid team that received the report. On October 23, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the said hospital as “foreign cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Mas” (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On October 30, 2015 and January 14, 2016, received surgery twice.

On February 16, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for approval of medical care for official duties with the Defendant on the ground of the application for the instant injury and disease. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of medical care for official duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the instant injury and disease appears to have occurred due to pre-determination or external factors of the Plaintiff.”

E. The Plaintiff, who was dissatisfied with the instant disposition, filed a request for review with the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee on October 12, 2017, but rendered a final decision to dismiss the Plaintiff’s request on October 12, 2017, and thereafter filed the instant lawsuit on January 18, 2018.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and 7 shall be numbered.

arrow