The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In particular, the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime of the same kind, and that the damage was not recovered is disadvantageous.

However, there are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has his wrong character divided and reflected in depth, the extent of damage, the fact that some crimes appear to have been committed against the defendant's family, and the fact that the defendant's family members want to have the preference against the defendant. The crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, is classified into the category 1: thief crime, 2 (general larceny), thief for general property, thief for special sentencing (hereinafter referred to as thief for special sentencing), 2 types (aggraf for special sentencing), 3th category for high sentencing (from October to 2), 2nd category for punishment, 2nd category for general property (general larceny), 1st category for special sentencing (the area of recommendation), 2nd category for special sentencing (the area of aggravated punishment), 3th category for general property (the area of aggravated punishment), 1th class to 3 years), and 2nd class punishment for general property (the area of aggravated punishment).

3. As the defendant's appeal has merit, the judgment below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the judgment below is ruled again after pleading as follows.

Criminal facts

The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by this court shall be as shown in the corresponding columns of the original judgment.

Criminal Procedure Act.