1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Fact that there is no dispute over the basic fact [based for recognition], evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), evidence Nos. 1, B, 1, and 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. Relevant Party 1) The Plaintiffs are D vehicles owned by C (hereinafter “instant accident vehicle”).

(1) The Daegu East-gu Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”) located in the Daegu-gu, Dong-gu after the traffic accident is faced with one another.

E (F) deceased on or around December 6, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”).

(2) The Daegu Masenedogalian Association, an incorporated foundation, is a party who has entered into a medical contract with the deceased or the plaintiffs and is the employer of the medical staff of the defendant hospital.

3) Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant insurance”) with respect to the instant accident vehicle C and the instant accident vehicle

(B) A contract is an insurance company that entered into. (1) On November 28, 2012, the Deceased was involved in the instant traffic accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant traffic accident”). At around 23:50 on November 28, 2012, the Deceased was faced with the backer of the instant vehicle driven by C in the H restaurant located in Seo-gu, Daegu (Seoul).

2) On November 30, 2012, the Deceased returned home after the instant traffic accident. Around November 30, 2012, the Deceased complained of symptoms, such as the two throughout the traffic accident, parassis and stoves, etc., and returned home to the Defendant Hospital. However, there was no special or abnormal opinion on the said examination, and the Deceased complained of the same symptoms. C) On December 1, 2012, the Deceased complained of the said symptoms by visiting the Defendant Hospital as an emergency room around 00:28.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital was brain CT test on the deceased at around 00:42 on the same day, but the special opinion was not observed, and the brain RI test was conducted on the same day at around 01:55 on the same day, and the deceased was diagnosed in chronological color, and around 06:30 on the deceased.