logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.18 2014가단39616
부동산소유권이전등기등
Text

1. The plaintiff's main claim against the defendant C shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's primary responsibility against the defendant B.

Reasons

1. Judgment as to the main claim

A. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B

(A) Of the attached Table No. 43.16 square meters, Defendant C divided ownership of Defendant B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, and Section B, Section B, and Section B, Section B, the Plaintiff occupied the building in the attached Table No. 3, which was constructed on October 1, 1994, and Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, and Section B, Section B, Section E, Section B, of Section B, Section E, and Section B, Section E, Section B, Section B, Section 1, and Section B, Section B, Section B, Section B, Section 5, were occupied on October 1, 201, and Section B, Section B, Section 1, Section 5, Section B, Section 5, and Section B, Section B, Section 1, Section 5, the Plaintiff’s ownership transfer registration on each of the instant land was completed on October 1, 2014.

The sectionally owned co-ownership relationship is legally established only when there is an agreement by many people to specify the location and area of the sectional ownership.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Da71409, Apr. 29, 2005). According to the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared the instant land, and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is not sufficient to support the Defendant.

arrow