beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000 if the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a current or former candidate for D party belonging to the local council member of Incheon City City Council 2, which was held on October 28, 2015.
No false fact shall be published with respect to the property, etc. of a candidate, his/her spouse, lineal ascendant or descendant, or his/her sibling, in favor of the candidate by means of a speech, broadcast, newspaper, communication, magazine, poster, propaganda document, or any other means, for the purpose of election.
The Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming a loan and a lawsuit claiming the repayment of loan with the Incheon District Court on June 18, 2014 and June 25, 2014, based on the credit he/she possessed with the Defendant, stated that the indictment is “ June 11, 2014.” However, it is correct because it is obvious that it is a clerical error.
Each of the above decisions won won in favor of each of the above decisions. Each of the above decisions became final and conclusive, and held the claim amounting to KRW 80,000,000 for the principal and interest thereon, and KRW 92,40,000 for the principal and interest thereon. The Defendant and the Defendant’s husband F was liable for KRW 58,024,00 for G and the Defendant’s husband’s joint and several liability amounting to KRW 154,716,00 for H credit cooperatives. The Defendant was well aware of the above facts.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 14:55 on October 8, 2015, filed an application for registration of a candidate with the Incheon Election Commission for the election of public officials at the same time, and filed a report on the property of a candidate to run in the election of public officials, as of December 31, 2014, which is the base date for the report on the candidate’s property, submitted a report on the candidate’s property to run in an election of public officials, stating the above bonds and debts for the election of public officials for the purpose of election, and submitted a false report on the candidate’s property for the election of public officials, even though the Defendant stated and reported the above claims and debts to the above E as of December 31, 2014.
Accordingly, the defendant will be favorable to the defendant who is a candidate for the purpose of election.