A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 12, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to an order to attach an electronic tracking device for two years, six months, and six years, due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims (a minor, rape, etc. under the age of 13) in the Chuncheon District Court. On November 13, 2012, the Defendant was actually released on November 13, 2012 due to the date of maturity or the date of detention in a workhouse due to default of a fine.

After completion of the execution of punishment, an electronic tracking device was attached.

A person with an electronic device installed shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility.

1. On November 15, 2012, around 08:45, the Defendant: (a) did not charge the location tracking device at the Defendant’s residence in Chuncheon C Apartment 104 Dong 1503, 1503; (b) did not charge the device by up to 11:47 on the same day; (c) thereby impairing the utility of the location tracking device by making it impossible to track the location tracking device for about 180 minutes; and (d) from around that time to September 15, 2015, the Defendant maintained the utility of the location tracking device by the aforementioned method more than 12 times in total, such as the entries in 1 to 4, 6 through 11, 13, and 17 on the list of offenses.

2. On December 10, 2013, the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, carried an electronic tracking device at the above Defendant’s residence, leaving out from the outside to 04:38 of the same day without any justifiable reason, thereby impairing the utility of the location tracking device by leaving the contact range from the above date to 04:38 of the same day, and the Defendant’s indictment No. 5 of the attached Table No. 201 from around that time to April 22, 2016, stating that “No. 14, 2013.” However, this is obvious that it is a clerical error in the “No. 23, 2013.”

12, 14 through 16, and 18, location tracking six times in total by the above methods.